<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.anthonysmith.me.uk &#187; Rowan Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/tag/rowan-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk</link>
	<description>Ceci n&#039;est pas un blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advice to an archbishop</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2008/02/09/advice-to-an-archbishop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2008/02/09/advice-to-an-archbishop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pluralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowan Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2008/02/09/advice-to-an-archbishop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So in a lecture Rowan Williams, admittedly in a display of "political ineptitude", makes some carefully reasoned and apparently reasonable (if obfuscatory) suggestions about how a single, unitary legal system (same laws for every citizen) might accommodate a diversity of religious and cultural practices on "certain carefully selected matters". Then what happens? For a thoughtful&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in a lecture <a title="The Archbishop of Canterbury's page" href="http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/1581">Rowan Williams</a>, admittedly in a display of <a title="Telegraph leader" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/02/08/dl0801.xml">"political ineptitude"</a>, makes some carefully reasoned and apparently reasonable (if obfuscatory) suggestions about how a single, unitary legal system (same laws for every citizen) might accommodate a diversity of religious and cultural practices on <a title="Archbishop's lecture" href="http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/1575">"certain carefully selected matters"</a>. Then what happens?</p>
<p>For a thoughtful analysis we can turn to <a href="http://davidpfield.blogspot.com/2008/02/meet-your-new-god.html">David Field</a>. Inane reactions are less difficult to find: <a title="The Sun" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article782629.ece">"Arch enemy: bash the bishop</a> ... in a damning You The Jury poll [b]y last night, 14,683 had called for his dismissal. Just 631 said he should  stay", <a title="Telegraph" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/09/nsharia109.xml">"barrage of criticism"</a>, <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/ukcorrespondents/holysmoke/feb08/rowanwilliamsauthority.htm">"fatuous remarks"</a>.</p>
<p>And we turn up our noses when <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/5349604.stm">some Muslims react violently to an academic lecture by the Pope</a>.</p>
<p>So my advice to Dr Williams, if he is reading, is this: keep it simple. If you can't make your point in half a dozen monosyllabic words, just don't say anything. Don't expect us to make an effort really to understand you. We won't. And be warned: if you get it wrong, we might form a mob and stone you (albeit <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article782700.ece">with sponges</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2008/02/09/advice-to-an-archbishop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

