Ceci n'est pas un blog
Posts tagged freedom
The sound of freedom
Jul 21st
Wonderful talk by Jeremy Begbie on the topic of freedom and Christian faith.
We tend to think that if we allow God into our lives, in the way that the Christian message suggests that we should, then that will make less room for ourselves. That is, there is a certain amount of “space” in my life, and the more God enters that “space”, the more I get shoved out. So to become a Christian is to diminish my freedom.
But this isn’t the only way of looking at things. Drawing heavily on the analogy of music, Begbie presents a much more enriching and appealing perspective on how the presence of God in my life affects my own freedom.
The only slightly frustrating thing about the talk was that many of the musical extracts were not included in the recording. I’ve tried to find some of them:
Lever du jour from Daphnis et Chloé, Suite No. 2, by Maurice Ravel
Spem in Alium by Thomas Tallis
J.S. Bach’s Chaconne in D minor, arranged by Busoni (part 1)
J.S. Bach’s Chaconne in D minor, arranged by Busoni (part 2)
Free speech
Nov 12th
Photo by lewishamdreamer
As a Bible-believing Christian, I am deeply committed to freedom of expression and to tolerance (for example, of those with whom I deeply disagree).
I’m talking about the freedom to believe something, and the freedom to express those beliefs – of course, with the proviso that those beliefs are not expressed with the intention to threaten, to cause abuse or to incite violence or any other criminal activity.
But it seems I am in a minority. Certainly I would be, in the House of Commons. The House of Lords previously secured the place of a “free speech” clause in the legislation for the recently-introduced homophobic hatred offence (an amendment tabled by Lord Waddington). This has been vigourously opposed by the Government, who are now trying to remove this clause. Here is the wording the Government finds so objectionable:
In this Part, for the avoidance of doubt, the discussion or criticism of sexual conduct or practices or the urging of persons to refrain from or modify such conduct or practices shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred.
From the government’s determined efforts to remove these words from the statute books, one may conclude that the Government would like it to be the case that if I merely express the belief that certain sexual conduct is wrong, then that may, of itself, be taken to be a “hate crime”.
Just think for a moment about what this means. Does no one believe in freedom of speech any more? Sure, my beliefs may be utterly repugnant, but should it be illegal for me to discuss them with anyone? Seriously?
Thank God for our unelected representatives in the House of Lords, who at least seem to believe in democracy and freedom of expression. But if the government has its way, we’re certainly going to see more cases like this and this.
What do you think? Is freedom of speech worth fighting for? Or are there some beliefs that are so obnoxious that it should be illegal to express them, under any circumstances?
Opto ergo sum (4) free to choose
Jan 17th
To be free to choose is to be free from commitment
… because to be committed means you’ve chosen already.
To be free to choose is to be free from belonging
… because if you belong you won’t choose not to belong.
To be free to choose is to be free from making choices
… because once you’ve made a choice you are no longer free to choose.
To be free to choose is to be free from any ties
… because ties limit your choices.
To be free to choose is to be free from certainty
… because if your mind is closed you are not free to consider new ideas.
To be free to choose is to be free from needing anything
… because if you depend on something you can’t choose to be without it.
To be free to choose is death.
I am a research fellow in 
Loading ...
