<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox or Safari?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/</link>
	<description>Ceci n&#039;est pas un blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Greg,

It&#039;s been ages!

Thanks for the comments - and thanks for alerting me to Firebug. I&#039;ve just downloaded it, and it seems really useful. (Though it doesn&#039;t seem to handle SSI&#039;s in SHTML, which limits its usefulness for the sites I&#039;m currently looking after.)

I thought IE7 was supposed to obey the CSS rules? I&#039;ve also banged my head a few times with IE6 - for &lt;a href=&quot;http://astronomy.sussex.ac.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;astronomy.sussex.ac.uk&lt;/a&gt; I eventually gave up and left it looking mediocre to people who don&#039;t use a proper browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>It's been ages!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments - and thanks for alerting me to Firebug. I've just downloaded it, and it seems really useful. (Though it doesn't seem to handle SSI's in SHTML, which limits its usefulness for the sites I'm currently looking after.)</p>
<p>I thought IE7 was supposed to obey the CSS rules? I've also banged my head a few times with IE6 - for <a href="http://astronomy.sussex.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow">astronomy.sussex.ac.uk</a> I eventually gave up and left it looking mediocre to people who don't use a proper browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>Heya,

Not to jump on this post late (only 10  months ago!) :P

Safari seems to do pretty well on the ACID2* test compared with Firefox. That said I&#039;m yet to run into layout issues with Firefox. I&#039;ve banged my head on the desk countless times with CSS issues in IE6/7.

I&#039;m a Firefox man myself, couldn&#039;t live without the Firebug extension these days.

Hope you&#039;re well.

* http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya,</p>
<p>Not to jump on this post late (only 10  months ago!) <img src='http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Safari seems to do pretty well on the ACID2* test compared with Firefox. That said I'm yet to run into layout issues with Firefox. I've banged my head on the desk countless times with CSS issues in IE6/7.</p>
<p>I'm a Firefox man myself, couldn't live without the Firebug extension these days.</p>
<p>Hope you're well.</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben - thanks for your comments.

I&#039;ve actually been using Camino for the past few months. It&#039;s very similar to Firefox, though without so many extensions and features (which I didn&#039;t use on Firefox anyway), and it feels more like a true Mac application. For example, it integrates with Keychain for passwords.

All I need now is an Intel version of PDF Plugin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben - thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>I've actually been using Camino for the past few months. It's very similar to Firefox, though without so many extensions and features (which I didn't use on Firefox anyway), and it feels more like a true Mac application. For example, it integrates with Keychain for passwords.</p>
<p>All I need now is an Intel version of PDF Plugin...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 07:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve also had a few &quot;won&#039;t close&quot; issues with firefox, just fyi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i've also had a few "won't close" issues with firefox, just fyi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 07:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>just my experience -- firefox tends to crash more often on my comp than safari. I don&#039;t know. also the shortcuts (key commands) for safari don&#039;t make my hands hurt as much. true that firefox is similar on all os&#039;s, but also from experience, firefox displays &quot;.png&quot; files differently on windows/linux than mac. (transparency issues)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just my experience -- firefox tends to crash more often on my comp than safari. I don't know. also the shortcuts (key commands) for safari don't make my hands hurt as much. true that firefox is similar on all os's, but also from experience, firefox displays ".png" files differently on windows/linux than mac. (transparency issues)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Please add firefox cookies/bad web sites immunization in next version!
Firefox 2 cannot reject third party cookies!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please add firefox cookies/bad web sites immunization in next version!<br />
Firefox 2 cannot reject third party cookies!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Sam,

That would indeed be a cool add-on for Firefox - perhaps you should write one? At least that would be &lt;i&gt;structured&lt;/i&gt; procrastination!

Back to work (really!)

Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>That would indeed be a cool add-on for Firefox - perhaps you should write one? At least that would be <i>structured</i> procrastination!</p>
<p>Back to work (really!)</p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Firefox Safari or Opera Shmopera, can any of them help you do work instead of procrastinating? 

Perhaps one of the cool Firefox add-ons is a browser block while surfing inanely with an automatic redirect to your excel file. In which case, Firefox would win. 

Situation pending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox Safari or Opera Shmopera, can any of them help you do work instead of procrastinating? </p>
<p>Perhaps one of the cool Firefox add-ons is a browser block while surfing inanely with an automatic redirect to your excel file. In which case, Firefox would win. </p>
<p>Situation pending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re both okay. I&#039;d say Firefox over Safari but they&#039;re much of a muchness. Neither of them should crash your Mac if you&#039;re running OSX.

Opera on the other hand eclipses them both â€“ once you get used to the dynamic book-marking system. The tabbed browsing is superb and there is quite an extensive Opera community for support if you need it.

http://www.opera.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They're both okay. I'd say Firefox over Safari but they're much of a muchness. Neither of them should crash your Mac if you're running OSX.</p>
<p>Opera on the other hand eclipses them both â€“ once you get used to the dynamic book-marking system. The tabbed browsing is superb and there is quite an extensive Opera community for support if you need it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opera.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opera.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Bec. It&#039;s been okay for the last couple of weeks - well, it sometimes crashes, and sometimes seems a bit greedy on the memory, but it hasn&#039;t made anything else go wrong ... yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bec. It's been okay for the last couple of weeks - well, it sometimes crashes, and sometimes seems a bit greedy on the memory, but it hasn't made anything else go wrong ... yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bec</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Bec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonysmith.me.uk/2006/07/10/firefox-or-safari/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>hi. at uni on our macs we use safari because firefox tends to crash them and make them do stupid things. just thought you might like to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi. at uni on our macs we use safari because firefox tends to crash them and make them do stupid things. just thought you might like to know...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

